A Radiologist’s Guide to the Performance and Interpretation of Obstetric Doppler US (2025)

Author Affiliations

Abstract

Spectral Doppler US of the umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery and color Doppler flow US of the placental site of umbilical cord insertion provide information that is integral to assessment of fetoplacental circulation and well-being.

References

• 1. FitzGerald DE, Stuart B, Drumm JE, Duignan NM. The assessment of the feto-placental circulation with continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1984;10(3):371–376.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 2. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32(6):1083–1101.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 3. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(1):116–126.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 4. Glanc P, Nyberg DA, Khati NJ, et al; Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria^® multiple gestations. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14(11S):S476–S489.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 5. Berkley E, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad A; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(4):300–308. [Published corrections appear in Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(6):508 and Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212(2):246.]

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 6. Nicolaides K, Rizzo, G, Hecher K, Ximenes R. Doppler in obstetrics. Sonoworld website. https://sonoworld.com/client/fetus/html/doppler/capitulos-html/intro-doppler.htmf. Published 2002. Accessed October 2, 2017.

  Google Scholar

• 7. Salvesen K, Lees C, Abramowicz J, et al; Bioeffects and Safety Committee. ISUOG-WFUMB statement on the non-medical use of ultrasound, 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38(5):608.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 8. Barnett SB, Kossoff G, eds. Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2004.

  Google Scholar

• 9. Salvesen K, Lees C, Abramowicz J, et al; Bioeffects and Safety Committee. ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13 + 6-week fetal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(6):628.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 10. Woodward PJ, Kennedy A, Sohaey R. Diagnostic imaging: obstetrics. 3rd ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2016.

  Google Scholar

• 11. Bahtiyar MO, Copel JA. Cardiac changes in the intrauterine growth-restricted fetus. Semin Perinatol 2008;32(3):190–193.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 12. McNally R, Alqudah A, Obradovic D, McClements L. Elucidating the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia using in vitro models of spiral uterine artery remodelling. Curr Hypertens Rep 2017;19(11):93. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653699/pdf/11906_2017_Article_786.pdf. Published October 23, 2017.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 13. Borrell A, Antolin E, Costa D, Farre MT, Martinez JM, Fortuny A. Abnormal ductus venosus blood flow in trisomy 21 fetuses during early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179(6 pt 1):1612–1617.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 14. Matias A, Gomes C, Flack N, Montenegro N, Nicolaides KH. Screening for chromosomal abnormalities at 10-14 weeks: the role of ductus venosus blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12(6):380–384.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 15. Papatheodorou SI, Evangelou E, Makrydimas G, Ioannidis JP. First-trimester ductus venosus screening for cardiac defects: a meta-analysis. BJOG 2011;118(12):1438–1445.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 16. Maiz N, Nicolaides KH. Ductus venosus in the first trimester: contribution to screening of chromosomal, cardiac defects and monochorionic twin complications. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;28(2):65–71.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 17. Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, Maltau JM, Kiserud T. Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192(3):937–944.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 18. Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, Maltau JM, Kiserud T. Reference ranges for serial measurements of blood velocity and pulsatility index at the intra-abdominal portion, and fetal and placental ends of the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26(2):162–169.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 19. Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, et al; Clinical Standards Committee. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41(2):233–239.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 20. Morrow RJ, Adamson SL, Bull SB, Ritchie JW. Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161(4):1055–1060.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

  See Also

  Umbilical arterial Doppler assessment | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.orgSonography Fetal Assessment, Protocols, and Interpretation

• 21. Trudinger BJ, Giles WB. Clinical and pathologic correlations of umbilical and uterine artery waveforms. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1989;32(4):669–678.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 22. Kiserud T, Kessler J, Ebbing C, Rasmussen S. Ductus venosus shunting in growth-restricted fetuses and the effect of umbilical circulatory compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28(2):143–149.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 23. Sanapo L, Turan OM, Turan S, Ton J, Atlas M, Baschat AA. Correlation analysis of ductus venosus velocity indices and fetal cardiac function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43(5):515–519.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 24. Seravalli V, Miller JL, Block-Abraham D, Baschat AA. Ductus venosus Doppler in the assessment of fetal cardiovascular health: an updated practical approach. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95(6):635–644.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 25. Turan OM, Turan S, Berg C, et al. Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38(3):295–302.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 26. Bahado-Singh RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A, et al. The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(3 pt 1):750–756.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 27. DeVore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(1):5–15.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 28. Dunn L, Sherrell H, Kumar S. Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta 2017;54:68–75.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 29. Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51(3):313–322.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 30. Mari G, Abuhamad AZ, Cosmi E, Segata M, Altaye M, Akiyama M. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: technique and variability. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24(4):425–430.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 31. Focus Information Technology. Expected peak velocity of systolic blood flow in the MCA as a function of gestational age. Focus Information Technology website. https://perinatology.com/calculators/MCA.htm. Published 2009. Accessed September 30, 2017.

  Google Scholar

• 32. Mari G, Detti L, Oz U, Zimmerman R, Duerig P, Stefos T. Accurate prediction of fetal hemoglobin by Doppler ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99(4):589–593.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 33. Norton ME, Chauhan SP, Dashe JS; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) clinical guideline #7: nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212(2):127–139.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 34. Macé G, Sauvan M, Castaigne V, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of 20 fetuses with parvovirus B19 infection complicated by severe anemia and/or fetal hydrops. Prenat Diagn 2014;34(11):1023–1030.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 35. Slaghekke F, Pasman S, Veujoz M, et al. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity to predict fetal hemoglobin levels in twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46(4):432–436.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 36. Velauthar L, Plana MN, Kalidindi M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43(5):500–507.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 37. Coppens M, Loquet P, Kollen M, De Neubourg F, Buytaert P. Longitudinal evaluation of uteroplacental and umbilical blood flow changes in normal early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7(2):114–121.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 38. Harman CR, Baschat AA. Comprehensive assessment of fetal wellbeing: which Doppler tests should be performed? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15(2):147–157.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 39. Figueras F, Caradeux J, Crispi F, Eixarch E, Peguero A, Gratacos E. Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(2 suppl):S790–S802.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 40. Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017;38:38–47.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 41. Kingdom JC, Audette MC, Hobson SR, Windrim RC, Morgen E. A placenta clinic approach to the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(2 suppl):S803–S817.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 42. Kulkarni A, Powel J, Aziz M, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis and outcomes: 35 cases from a single maternal-fetal medicine practice. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37(4):1017–1024.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 43. Melcer Y, Jauniaux E, Maymon S, et al. Impact of targeted scanning protocols on perinatal outcomes in pregnancies at risk of placenta accreta spectrum or vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(4):443.e1–443.e8. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(18)30020-6/fulltext. Published January 17, 2018.

  Google Scholar

• 44. Jauniaux E, Melcer Y, Maymon R. Prenatal diagnosis and management of vasa previa in twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216(6):568–575.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 45. Cambiaso O, Zhao DP, Abasolo JI, et al. Discordance of cord insertions as a predictor of discordant fetal growth in monochorionic twins. Placenta 2016;47:81–85.

  MedlineGoogle Scholar

• 46. Kent EM, Breathnach FM, Gillan JE, et al. Placental cord insertion and birthweight discordance in twin pregnancies: results of the national prospective ESPRiT Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(4):376.e1–376.e7. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(11)00824-6/fulltext. Published June 25, 2011.

  Google Scholar